2020年(nián)高(gāo)等教育趨勢
2020-11-22 08:11:44
INTRODUCTION

The world of higher education today is far different than thφe one of even five years ago. Institutions have seen ₽enormous shifts concerning the face of the student population, the ∞support services they require, the most effective sφtrategies to engage and recruit them, and more. In t₩his state of flux, many institutions are pursuing innovative strategies to thrive amid unceφrtain funding and to provide the support students need most.
Institutions are seeing a new student population—more adult and non-traditional learners a₽re pursuing degrees, increasing the demand for flexible education models. At the same time, institu★tions are contending with a decrease in internatio§nal students and an increase in underrepresented stude✔nts who require distinct support services to attract them to campus and keep them e&nrolled through graduation. In order to keep their institutions thriving and☆ well-known to prospective students and donors alike, colleges and universit≤ies are increasingly experimenting with their financial models and marketing strategies, changing ₹the ways in which they have traditionally operated.
The 2020 TRENDS IN HIGHER EDUCATION report unpacks crucial shγifts in higher education that are likely to affect most insφtitutions—from domestic to international—and provi←des strategies to help them evolve. As they navigate these changes, institutions haveβ the opportunity to establish themselves as leaders in higher education.
NEW TUITION TACTICS
REVITALIZE INTERNATIONAL
STUDENT RECRUITMENT

After decades of steady growth, enrollments of new in®ternational students in U.S. institutions are declining. In 2018–19, 1,09>5,299 international students enrolled as first-time undergraduates, a decline of 9.5% from 2014 –15. Non-United States markets are also seeing internationa l enrollment decline or stagnation. The United Kingdo m’s international enrollment has stayed largely flat, only rising 4.1% between 2012 –13 and 2016 –17, while New Zealand has seen a substantial ∞decline in international enrollments in the vocational and technical education sector. ≥;
While some attribute the United States’ international student enrollment decline to the cur<rent administration’s stricter immigration policies, ×others believe that the primary factor is the heavy tuition that institutions force internatio¶nal students to pay. International students paid on av↓erage $26,290 for undergraduate tuition in 2018 –19—a 42% increase from a decade before. Internπational students often do not receive the same benefits afforded to American students, such as financial aid assistance, that could ease the burden of• high tuition. To avoid missing out on the additional revenue that i↑nternational students bring, institutions are considering lowering th∏e underlying cost of education for international students.

How Will Institutions Boost International
Student Enrollment in 2020?

1. Conduct Outreach to New International Markets: Institutions are increasingly pursuing diversification strategies i•n which they broaden recruitment outreach to emerging <international markets. Countries with a rapidly expanding ☆middle class or economy, such as Bangladesh and Ghana, are particularl÷y promising. Additional emerging markets include Nepal and Kuwait.
2. Reduce Reliance on Oversaturated International
Markets: Many factors contributing to the decline in internat&ional student enrollment are out of institutions’ control: Some foreign governments, s₹uch as Brazil and Saudi Arabia, have reduced schola•rships that previously sent significant numbers of students to the United States, while China’s e≈fforts to improve its domestic university system have kept more studen≠ts at home. Institutions are increasingly deprioritizing these oversatu★rated markets to save their efforts for markets that are more promising.
3. Provide Additional Visa and International
Support Services: While 60% of schools with declini ng international enrollment have cited social and political pressures in the Unit>ed States as factors contributing to enrollment decline, the most frequently cited issue (by 83% ♠of schools) is the visa application process or visa issues/delays. In response,← institutions have established additional immigration- related legal services or stuγdent support services to help students navigate the process.
4. Foster Post-Study Work Opportunities: Research has found a sπtrong positive correlation between the availability
of temporary post-study work opportunities and growth in international enrollment. Building relaβtionships with employers that help streamline the path from graduation to a€ career may make institutions more attractive.
5. Develop Student Services That Acclimate
International Students to Campus: Offering support that focuses on the unique challenges internat•ional students face while studying in the United States—such as language barriers, culture shock, unfamiliarity with the American education system, a₽nd more—can help institutions develop a reputation for being particularly welcoming to students f±rom abroad.
For example, the University of Maryland-College Park’s counseling center employs pΩsychologists who speak a variety of languages, including Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, Hindi, and Gujarati, to make students f♦eel understood and at ease.
NON-TRADITIONAL ACADEMIC PROGRAMS PREPARE
STUDENTS FOR THE WORKFORCE

With more students frustrated by the cost and time requirements of traditioσnal degree programs, institutions are increasingly investing in strategies to i↑dentify and serve non-traditional undergraduate students. Such st♦udents can include adult learners, individuals with dependents, students atteδnding classes part-time, or financially independent students. Higherπ education providers are developing offerings that present alternative educati↔on delivery models to appeal to these students’ unique responsibilities and academic goals. For ex©ample, universities may emphasize workplace skills through experiential learning opportunitπies and offer microcredentials that allow students to build the skills they need while avoiding tΩhe higher cost and time commitment of a full degree.

What Will Non-Traditional Academic
Programs Look Like in 2020?

Pursue Minimum Viable Product Program Development: These programs focus ♦on employment skills and are financed by income share™ agreements. Many include guaranteed employment,&nbs✘p;apprenticeships (physical and digital), and placement programs. Instituti&ons first train students in the cognitive and non-cognitive skills needed for en¶try-level positions, then focus on building practical technical skills, and finally help students± find employment.
Invest in Career and Technical Programs: CTE programs are designed to prepare stu dents for their future careers, often with hands-on vocational training. Man$y institutions are investing in high-quality CTE programs that can improve student engag↑ement, graduation rates, and postsecondary earning potential. While considering C→TE programs, institutions should analyze employment§ projections and conduct wage analyses to position graduates tosecure jobs.
Emphasize Competency-Based Degrees and Education: A 2019 survey suggests that 74% of ↔institutions are in the process of adopting or are interested in adopting competency- b≈ased education programs. Competency-based education may
be a better fit for adult learners, who may be more interested™ in directly learning practical skills that have a direct application☆ to the workforce. Via competency testing, students progress through courses at their♣ own pace, and then demonstrate their proficiency.Consider Achievement Tracking Instead of Credit
Hours: Rather than relying on credit hours, institutions track achievements to focus on whether students have actually l>earned the material. Movements like the Association of American Colleges & Uniεversities’ Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education aim to deepen i→nstitutions’ ability to describe and measure proficiency in aφcademic performance. Institutions incorporating achievement tra←cking set fixed learning outcomes and note if students are ↑on track with their learning.
Offer Microcredentials in Focused Subject Areas: Microcredentials offer an opportunity for s↑kill specialization and address a movement amon≤g employers to emphasize skills instead of formal degree attainment. These credentials $typically consist of two to four college courses in a particular £field. In 2017, 26% of institutions offered microcredent&ials, an increase from 13% in 2016.
Provide Work Experience Via Experiential Learning
Opportunities: Non-traditional students can be∑nefit from work programs that allow them to gain experience remotely, ±achieving their goals while reducing the time commitment. Northeastern University’s Expe₩riential Network allows students to remotely complπete real projects for corporate sponsors, providing real-world experience for s≤tudents unable to commit to an internship or traditional experiential learning ✔opportunities.
STUDENT DIVERSITY
SERVICES SUPPORT THE RISE
OF UNDERREPRESENTED
STUDENTS

Higher education campuses are increasingly diverse, hosting students from ✘vastly different cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds. N→ow, students of color comprise more than 45% of undergrad×uates, compared with less than 30% in 1996. Similarly, nearly on↓e-third of all students are the first in their family to attend a higher♦ education institution. Because these students face uni que challenges in higher education, many institutions now provide services specifically tailore♥d to help them succeed. As these students become mo re prominent on college campuses, higher education providers that are b→etter equipped to address their needs will have an adβvantage in recruiting from traditionally under-tapped populations. To₩ help underrepresented students find a home on campus, insti•tutions are pursuing initiatives that help these students succeed academically and socially₩.

How Will Institutions Support
Underrepresented Students in 2020?

1. Engage Parents in Students’ Education: By involvin¥g parents in their children’s higher education, δinstitutions
aim to increase first-generation and underrepresented student retention. For examp®le, Elizabethtown College in Pennsylvania developed a 7-week interactγive online video course for parents of freshmen, which covers the daily facets of campus ®life and how to interact with their children about commoλn higher education challenges.
2. Help Students Meet Basic Financial Needs: Approximately 3♦9% of undergraduates live below 130% of the federal poverty line. Instituti↕ons are developing services that help students meet their basic needs s↓o that they can focus more on academics. For example, over 640 institutions&nbσsp;now operate food pantries on campus.
3.Conduct Proactive Outreach to Underperforming
Students: Rather than expecting students to access campus resources on their own, insti×tutions can track student performance and take the ini↕tiative in reaching out when students face challenges. Georgia State University’s “GPS Advisinλg” system monitors student performance and notifies counselors if a student appear>s to be in trouble. As a result, Georgia State has turned its≠elf into a leader among United States institutions for↑ generating high academic achievement by population×s that have often struggled at large, predominantly white institution¥s: this includes African- American students, lower-income students, and first- generation studenσts.
4.Incorporate Peer Mentors Into the Support
Process: Effective peer mentors can help underrepresented students transition to college lif≠e and develop necessary academic and life skills. For example, Dickinson College♥’s new peer mentoring program is designed specifically for underrepresented students and integrates them into social events, while teaching them αskills such as how to ask professors for help.
5. Support and Hire Faculty of Color: Prior studies hav≈e demonstrated that the number of faculty of color on campus is associat÷ed with increased persistence among students
of color. Faculty from diverse backgrounds help facilitate a culture of inclusion on campus, d'evelop curriculum with a greater diversity of topics, and serve as effec±tive mentors for underrepresented students.
下(xià)一(yī)篇AR技(jì)術(shù)教育應用(yòng)的(de)實踐探索



